Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Blake Ellis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Ellis analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Blake Ellis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marchenko 0 - 0 Ellis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 50.35% of points on his second serve, while Ellis has won 50.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 44.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ellis has won 50.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.5% and 30.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ellis has saved 56.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 59.68% of matches played (W/L 37/ 25), with Ellis winning 61.9% (W/L 52/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Ellis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 168/ 132).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19), where as Ellis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 32/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.11 while Ellis has played against players with an average rank of 212.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ellis has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ellis has converted 43.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
216
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
372
Rank
348
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (602-447)
Career Total W/L
58% (213-156)
38% (8-13)
YTD W/L
59% (20-14)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Blake Ellis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (8/13) | 59% (20/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (21/30) | 57% (44/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (242/266) | 53% (399/355) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 54% (14/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.67 |
| Aces Total | 116 | 247 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:40 | 1:38:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 267.95 | 212.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (939/1662) | 62% (1398/2269) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (659/939) | 73% (1015/1398) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (364/723) | 51% (444/871) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (47/141) | 43% (93/216) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (586/1633) | 38% (840/2208) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 56% (10/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 61% (20/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 50% (9/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 84% (19/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 27% (15/4) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Adam Walton
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
17
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Illya Marchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Blake Ellis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Blake Ellis
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Colin Sinclair
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Kai-I Wang
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Blake Ellis
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Sheng Tang
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Blake Ellis
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
11
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
10
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Luke Saville
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Blake Ellis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 7-6(1) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Moez Echargui
46%
(
59 of
129)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
19
Aces
14
9
Double Faults
5
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
44%
(
31 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
51 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
120
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Ellis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
